Skip to main content
. 2014 May 29;9(5):e98540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098540

Table 4. Model predicted early preeclampsia detection rate (95% CI) for FPR of 10% with prior risk, MAP, taurine, asparagine and glycylglycine in control and preeclampsia groups.

Training set Test set Validation set
DR at 10% FPR (95% CI) AUC DR at 10% FPR (95% CI) AUC DR at 10% FPR (95% CI) AUC
EO-PE
Prior risk 30 (16–49) 0.74 69 (48–85) 0.92 30 (14–50) 0.73
Prior risk + MAP 55 (37–72) 0.88 81 (58–92) 0.91
Prior risk + taurine 48 (31–66) 0.80 65 (43–82) 0.90
Prior risk + asparagine 36 (22–56) 0.77 70 (48–85) 0.91
Prior risk + MAP + taurine 55 (37–72) 0.88 88 (70–97)* 0.93 55 (36–76) 0.78
Prior risk + MAP + asparagine 55(37–72) 0.87 75 (53–89) 0.91
Prior risk+ MAP + taurine + asparagine 55 (37–72) 0.87 88 (70–97) 0.93
LO-PE
Prior risk 37 (24–53) 0.75 38 (22–55) 0.70 17 (8–35) 0.55
Prior risk + MAP 43 (28–58) 0.81 46 (30–64)* 0.79 17 (8–35) 0.65
Prior risk + glycylglycine 46 (31–60) 0.79 38 (21–59) 0.72
Prior risk + MAP + glycylglycine 53 (37–67) 0.83 42 (27–61) 0.78

DR: detection rate; FPR: false positive rate; MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure; CI: confidence interval; AUC: area under curve, EO-PE: early-onset preeclampsia; LO-PE: late-onset preeclampsia.

*The best model selected for further validation.