Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Apr 14;40(3):1228–1236. doi: 10.1037/a0036214

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A comparison of the effects of sinewave precursors (Experiment 1 in panel A) and selectively-reversed sinewave precursors (Experiment 2 in panel B). Whereas sinewave precursors produce strong (average mean difference across conditions = 7.43%, p < .0001), the precursor conditions are not reliably different in Experiment 2 (average mean difference across conditions = 2.57%, p = 0.21). The weak trends noticeable between continuum steps 4 through 7 maybe explained due to the masking produced by the concentration of energy in F3 (see Figure 3).