. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Dec 2;143(3):1369–1392. doi: 10.1037/a0035028

Table 7.

Study 4: The effect of explicit thermometer ratings on participants’ implicit-attitude predictions

Parameters (DV: Score predictions)	Model 1 estimates	Model 2 estimates
Fixed effects
Explicit thermometer ratings	.47^***	.37^***
Therm. × Explanation	−.01	.00
Therm. × Experience	.04	.03
Therm. × Explanation × Experience	−.01	−.03
IAT D-scores		.43^***
IAT score × Explanation		−.01
IAT score × Experience		−.03
IAT score × Explanation × Experience		.02

Random effect variances
Explicit thermometer ratings	.122^***	.091^***
IAT D-scores		.011
Residuals	.517^***	.388^***

Goodness of fit
−2 log likelihood	1815.75	1624.92

^***

p<.001

All level-1 variables are standardized for each individual participant before they are entered in the analysis. “Explanation”, “Experience”, and “Explanation × Experience” refer to Level-2 (between-subject) predictors that are contrast-coded “−1” for no or minimal, and “1” for full explanation or experience, respectively. The interaction term is the product of these two codes.