. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Dec 2;143(3):1369–1392. doi: 10.1037/a0035028

Table 9.

Time-2 thermometer ratings regressed on participants’ time-1 thermometer ratings and IAT D-scores.

Parameters (DV: thermometer t2)	Study 1 estimates	Study 2 estimates	Study 3 estimates	Study 4 estimates
Fixed effects
Thermometer t1	.64^***	.74^***	.52^***	.55^***
IAT D-scores	.28^***	.20^***	.39^***	.34^***

Random effect variances
Thermometer t1	.152^***	.058^***	.072^***	.101^***
IAT D-scores	.107^***	.050^**	.025	.044^**
Residuals	.206^***	.176^***	.295^***	.277^***

Goodness of fit
−2 log likelihood	572.86	646.73	1089.10	1449.41

^**

p<.01

^***

p<.001

Thermometer t1: Thermometer ratings completed before participants made their IAT score predictions; thermometer t2: Thermometer ratings completed after participants completed all predictions and IATs. All level-1 variables are standardized for each individual participant before they are entered in the analyses. Level-2 condition assignments are included in the analyses as control variables, but not represented here for simplicity. Thermometer ratings are simple scores in Studies 1 and 2, but reverse-scored in this table for easier comparability. Thermometer ratings in Studies 3 and 4 are computed as difference scores comparable to the IATs.