Skip to main content
. 2014 May 30;8:105. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00105

Table 1.

Feedback's effect on area summation curve features and model parameters.

High contrast Control Feedback inactive p-value
Summation field diameter (°) 0.46 ± 0.20 0.51 ± 0.22 0.01
Peak response rate (s−1) 54 ± 32 59 ± 35 0.06
Surround diameter (°) 4.4 ± 1.5 4.1 ± 1.6 0.009
Asymptote rate (s−1) 12 ± 15 19 ± 20 <0.001
SSI (a.u.) 0.79 ± 0.17 0.71 ± 0.22 <0.001
kD (a.u.) 1730 [3110] 1770 [2440] 0.7
kN (a.u.) 12.9 [13.8] 7.99 [14.5] 0.2
wD (°) 0.32 ± 0.25 0.31 ± 0.18 0.8
wN (°) 1.96 ± 1.29 1.72 ± 1.22 0.006
Low contrast Control Feedback inactive p-value
Summation field diameter (°) 0.71 ± 0.65 0.72 ± 0.38 0.9
Peak response rate (s−1) 32 ± 22 37 ± 27 0.01
Surround diameter (°) 4.6 ± 1.6 4.7 ± 1.5 0.6
Asymptote rate (s−1) 9.6 ± 12 12 ± 14 0.01
SSI (a.u.) 0.71 ± 0.26 0.68 ± 0.25 0.10
kD (a.u.) 532 [613] 450 [817] 1
kN (a.u.) 5.02 [5.89] 3.79 [5.82] 0.1
wD (°) 0.39 ± 0.29 0.40 ± 0.20 0.8
wN (°) 2.14 ± 1.31 2.11 ± 1.33 0.6

Mean ± SD and t-test used everywhere except for kD and kN reported as median [IQR] and Mann-Whitney U-test.