Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 17;5(8):2293–2304. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1906

Table 1. Characteritics and outcome for patients subjected to molecular analyses compared with those for the intention-to-treat (ITT) population of the LETS study.

Somatic mutation analysis
(n = 275)
Fusion gene analysis
(n = 240)
MET amplification analysis
(n = 229)
ITT population
(n = 564)
Characteristic
CBDCA+PTX/CBDCA+S-1 136 (49%)/139 (51%) 117 (49%)/123 (51%) 113 (49%)/116 (51%) 282 (50%)/282 (50%)
Median age (range), years 63 (36–74) 64 (36–74) 63 (36–74) 64 (36–74)
Male/female 211 (77%)/64 (23%) 184 (77%)/56 (23%) 178 (78%)/51 (22%) 433 (77%)/131 (23%)
ECOG PS 0/1 76 (28%)/199 (72%) 63 (26%)/177 (74%) 62 (27%)/167 (73%) 177 (31%)/387 (69%)
Clinical stage IIIB/IV 68 (25%)/207 (75%) 59 (25%)/181 (75%) 60 (26%)/169 (74%) 136 (24%)/428 (76%)
Nonsmoker/smoker 49 (18%)/226 (82%) 44 (18%)/196 (82%) 38 (17%)/191 (83%) 104 (18%)/460 (82%)
Outcome
PFS hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.88 (0.70–1.12) 0.95 (0.74–1.24) 0.83 (0.64–1.09) 1.04 (0.86–1.22)
OS hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.93 (0.71–1.21) 0.85 (0.64–1.13) 0.91 (0.68–1.21) 0.96 (0.79–1.15)

Abbreviations: CBDCA, carboplatin; PTX, paclitaxel; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PS, performance status; PFS, progression-free survival; CI, confidence interval; OS, overall survival.