Table 1.
Evaluation of the training method, training materials and trainers
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
f |
Average |
Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not at all (%) | Slightly (%) | Somewhat (%) | Very (%) | Extremely (%) | ||||
| Training method | ||||||||
| 1. The objectives of the clinical skill lab sessions were defined very clearly represented |
2 (0.9) |
6 (2.6) |
60 (25.9) |
122 (52.6) |
42 (18.1) |
232 |
3.84 |
0.698 |
| 2. Technical simulations were clearly represented/conducted |
0 (0) |
2 (0.9) |
38 (16.4) |
115 (49.6) |
77 (33.2) |
232 |
4.15 |
1.090 |
| 3. The ratio between theoretical training and clinical practice was satisfactory |
5 (2.2) |
18 (7.8) |
67 (28.9) |
85 (36.6) |
57 (24.6) |
232 |
3.74 |
0.800 |
| 4. The amount of time allotted to practice was satisfactory |
7 (3.0) |
33 (14.2) |
81 (34.9) |
78 (33.6) |
33 (14.2) |
232 |
3.42 |
0.866 |
| Training Materials | ||||||||
| The visual media (video, audio) were satisfactory |
0 (0) |
8 (3.4) |
52 (22.4) |
97 (41.8) |
75 (32.3) |
232 |
4.03 |
0.823 |
| The equipment and disposables were satisfactory |
5 (2.2) |
26 (11.2) |
83 (35.8) |
66 (28.4) |
52 (22.4) |
232 |
3.58 |
0.938 |
| The models and mannequins were in good condition |
1 (0.4) |
14 (6.0) |
64 (27.6) |
94 (40.5) |
59 (25.4) |
232 |
3.84 |
0.944 |
| The checklists produced and the observations grids prompted me to think critically |
1 (0.4) |
23 (9.9) |
82 (35.3) |
81 (34.9) |
45 (19.4) |
232 |
3.63 |
0.936 |
| The checklists produced and the observations grids prompted me to search for scientific evidence |
2 (0.9) |
27 (11.6) |
94 (40.5) |
67 (28.9) |
42 (18.1) |
232 |
3.52 |
0.945 |
| I may use the checklists produced and the observation grids as reference in the future |
3 (1.3) |
10 (4.3) |
42 (18.1) |
82 (35.3) |
95 (40.9) |
232 |
4.10 |
0.731 |
| Trainers | ||||||||
| Were communicative |
0 (0) |
1 (0.4) |
29 (12.5) |
117 (50.4) |
85 (36.6) |
232 |
4.23 |
0.491 |
| Provided satisfactory answers to student questions |
0 (0) |
1 (0.4) |
17 (7.3) |
95 (40.9) |
119 (51.3) |
232 |
4.43 |
0.490 |
| Were approachable |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
15 (6.5) |
85 (36.6) |
132 (56.9) |
232 |
4.50 |
0.536 |
| Cooperated with the students |
0 (0) |
0 |
20 (8.6) |
87 (37.5) |
125 (53.9) |
232 |
4.45 |
0.519 |
| I would like to participate in a similar clinical skill lab again and to be contacted by the trainers | 0 (0) | 6 (2.6) | 25 (10.8) | 78 (53.0) | 123 (53.0) | 232 | 4.37 | 0.635 |