. 2014 May 30;9(5):e98680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098680

Table 6. Association between social exclusion indices and known risk factors and correlates: standardised regression coefficients and p-values.

		Index1Amsterdam		Index2Den Haag enRotterdam		Index3Utrecht		IndexSCP^a
		(n = 6368)		(n = 9238)		(n = 3763)		(n = 574)
		β	p	β	p	β	p	β	p
Educational level	Low educational level (no education and primary school)	0.22	^**	0.24	^**	0.24	^**	0.12	^**
Ethnic background	Non-Western ethnic background	0.28	^**	0.34	^**	0.33	^**	0.18	^**
Family situation	Single parent with underage child(ren)	0.11	^**	0.13	^**	0.10	^**	0.13	^**
	Living alone	0.14	^**	0.13	^**	0.15	^**	0.16	^**
Labour marketposition (54 years oryounger)	Unemployed and/or recipient of social securityor disability benefits. (SCP:Receives unemployment benefit,disability benefit or social assistance benefit)	0.34	^**	0.36	^**	0.32	^**	-0.03	ns
	No paid job	0.19	^**	0.19	^**	0.23	^**	0.02	ns
Income	Income below modal (1,700 Euros net per month)	0.41	^**	0.41	^**	0.38	^**	0.23	^**
Health	Self-rated health fair or poor	0.34	^**	0.38	^**	0.37	^**	0.19	^**
	Diagnosed with at least one chronic condition.(SCP: Suffers from a disability or a chronic condition)	0.19	^**	0.19	^**	0.18	^**	0.09	^*
	Impaired in daily activities at home,at school, at work or in theirleisure time owing to chronic conditions	0.29	^**	0.29	^**	0.25	^**
	High risk for anxiety and depressiondisorder. (SCP: Low subjective well-being)	0.43	^**	0.45	^**	0.43	^**	0.30	^**
Self-reliance	Received help in completing thehealth questionnaire.(SCP: Needs help filling in forms)	0.16	^**	0.16	^**	0.18	^**	0.06	ns
	Low perceived life control &			0.31	^**	0.46	^**
Neighbourhood	Living in deprived neighbourhood	0.15	^**	0.24	^**	0.24	^**

*Significant effect, p<0.05;

**Significant effect, p<0.01,

ns Not significant, p> = 0.05.

% Kessler psychological distress scale (K10), score 30 or higher.

& Pearlin & Schooler Mastery Scale, score < = 19.

Vrooman and Hoff [10].

Explanatory note. Linear regression analyses were used to assess relationships between social exclusion indices and known risk factors and correlates. Construct validity was considered satisfactory if at least 75% of the associations were in correspondence with predefined hypotheses.