Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Res. 2013 Nov 23;32(2):245–252. doi: 10.1002/jor.22516

Table 4.

Comparison of Mean Biomechanical Properties and Biochemical Composition Between Endplate Cartilage Samples With and Without Histologic Evidence of Damage

No Damage (n = 12 Endplates) Damage (n = 8 Endplates) % Differencea p-Value
A (MPa) 0.25 ± 0.19 0.22 ± 0.12 –15.4 0.74
B 30.5 ± 10.2 21.2 ± 5.8 –30.2 0.15
Tensile modulus, E0% (MPa) 6.6 ± 4.4 4.8 ± 3.5 –27.7 0.50
Energy dissipation, C (MPa) 0.031 ± 0.010 0.041 ± 0.013 31.3 0.18
Short relaxation constant, τ1 (s) 4.7E–5 ± 5.3E–5 7.3E–5 ± 6.7E–5 55.3 0.48
Long relaxation constant, τ2 (s) 382 ± 132 336 ± 187 –12.1 0.64
Water content (%) 42.3 ± 7.3 35.8 ± 8.1 –15.4 0.15
GAG content (μg/mg dry wt) 108.3 ± 21.3 87.1 ± 21.3 –19.6 0.20
Collagen content (μg/mg dry wt) 593.4 ± 107.8 506.1 ± 75.2 –14.7 0.20

Data given as mean ± 95% CI.

a

Percent difference calculated with respect to the “No damage” mean values.