Skip to main content
. 2014 May 22;14:57. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-57

Table 5.

Discriminative validity of condition specific OIDP: association of condition specific OIDP and the presence or absence of hypodontia, the severity of hypodontia and anterior or upper anterior localisation of hypodontia

  Mean OIDP (SD) Effect size OIDP > 0, % (n) Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR a (95% CI)
Presence of hypodontia
 
 
 
 
 
Non-hypodontia
0.3 (1.1)
 
9.9 (10)
1
1
Hypodontia
2.4 (5.5)**
0.6
30.6 (19)**
4.0 (1.7 – 9.4)
3.4 (1.4 – 8.0)
Severity of hypodontia
 
 
 
 
 
Non-hypodontia
0.3 (1.1)
 
9.9 (10)
1
1
Mild (1–5 teeth missing)
1.4 (4.2)
0.4
16.1 (5)
1.8 (0.5 – 5.6)
1.6 (0.5 – 5.2)
Severe (≥ 6 teeth missing)
3.4 (6.6)**
0.8
45.2 (14)**
2.7 (1.7 – 4.4)
2.5 (1.5 – 4.3)
All anterior hypodontia
 
 
 
 
 
Non-hypodontia
0.3 (1.1)
 
9.9 (10)
1
1
All anterior hypodontiab
3.0 (6.3)**
0.7
37.2 (16)**
5.4 (2.2 – 13.3)
4.8 (1.9 – 12.0)
Other hypodontia
1.1 (3.3)
0.4
15.8 (3)
1.3 (0.7 – 2.6)
1.2 (0.6 – 2.4)
Upper anterior hypodontia
 
 
 
 
 
Non-hypodontia
0.3 (1.1)
 
9.9 (10)
1
1
Upper anterior hypodontiac
3.8 (7.1)**
0.9
43.8 (14)**
7.1 (2.7 – 18.4)
7.0 (2.6 – 18.7)
Other hypodontia 0.9 (2.7) 0.3 16.7 (5) 1.3 (0.8 – 2.4) 1.1 (0.6 – 2.1)

**p < 0.01.

aAdjusted OR for sex and age.

bAt least one tooth missing in the anterior segment.

cAt least one tooth missing in the maxillary anterior segment.