Table 5.
Author, year of publication (ref) |
Study area and target population/Study design | Sample size and prevalence of home births | Reasons for home births |
---|---|---|---|
Rahi et al, 200622 | One Urban slum in Delhi, Births recorded during April–June 2005, cross-sectional survey | n=82 births Home births=56.1% |
Not reported |
Agarwal et al, 200723 | One urban slum in Delhi, women who delivered last 1 year, cross-sectional survey | n=82 Home births=31.8% |
Lack of awareness for need for check-up (27%) Lack of knowledge about service availability (17%) Long waiting time (22%) None to accompany (15%) Finance (12%) Fear of hospitals (7%) Family objections (2%) |
DLHS Fact sheet (2007–2008)14 | Delhi state in 2008 using multistage stratified probability sampling | n=9689 households Home births Rural=42.6% Urban=29.9% Total=30.8% |
Not reported |
Thind et al, 200820 | NFHS survey data from Maharashtra, cross sectional survey | n=1510 recent births Home births (overall)=37% Only urban=15.3% |
Predisposing factors Religion (Hindu), multiple births and caste |
Agarwal et al, 201024 | 11 slums of Indore, Madhya Pradesh, cross-sectional survey of mothers of infants (2004–2006) | n=312 Home births=56.4% |
Not reported |
Das et al, 201025 | Mumbai slums from 6 municipal wards, survelllance study (2005–2007) | n=10 754 births Home births=10% |
Customary (28%), No time to reach hospital (13%), no body to go along (8%), Fear (7%) |
Dasgupta et al, 200621 | Rural and urban clusters in West Bengal from Birbhum district. Cross-sectional survey, women who delivered in the last 1 year | n=320 Home births (rural and urban combined)=51.88% |
Not reported |
Khan et al, 200926 | Periurban area of Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh | n=92 mother of infants Home births=60% |
Tradition (42%) Related to economics (31%) |
Hazarika, 200913 | NFHS-3 Delhi data, cross-sectional survey, women who delivered 6 months ago | n=2420 (slum dwellers) Home births=22.62% |
Not reported |
NFHS, National Family Health Survey.