Skip to main content
. 2014 May 19;14:54. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-54

Table 1.

Comparison of the baseline factors between the two groups

Factors
Group
p-value*
  Resin sealant ART sealant  
Participant
 
 
 
#Age (SD)
7.8 (0.66)
7.8 (0.66)
0.695
Gender
 
 
0.881
-Boy
70 (44.6%)
70 (43.8%)
 
-Girl
87 (55.4%)
90 (56.2%)
 
Snacking habit
 
 
0.152
-Once a day or less
116 (73.9%)
129 (80.6%)
 
-Twice or more a day
41 (26.1%)
31 (19.4%)
 
Tooth brushing habit
 
 
0.901
-Once a day or less
56 (35.7%)
56 (35.0%)
 
-Twice or more a day
101 (64.3%)
104 (65.0%)
 
Group allocation combination
 
 
0.942
-Sealant/sealant
40 (25.5%)
40 (25.0%)
 
-Sealant/SDF
62 (39.5%)
61 (38.1%)
 
-Sealant/NaFΦ
55 (35.0%)
59 (36.9%)
 
Molar
 
 
 
Group allocation combination
 
 
0.624
-Sealant/sealant
47 (24.9%)
45 (23.2%)
 
-Sealant/SDF
77 (40.7%)
73 (37.6%)
 
-Sealant/NaF
65 (34.4%)
76 (39.2%)
 
Baseline molar status
 
 
0.047
-Sound with deep fissure
166 (87.8%)
156 (80.4%)
 
-Present with incipient caries
23 (12.2%)
38 (19.6%)
 
Location
 
 
0.964
-Upper molar
53 (28.0%)
54 (27.8%)
 
-Lower molar
136 (72.0%)
140 (72.2%)
 
DIAGNOdent reading
 
 
0.543
-0 ~ 15
77 (40.7%)
85 (43.8%)
 
-16 ~ 39 112 (59.3%) 109 (56.2%)  

Comparisons were performed by using Chi-square test otherwise specified while respective percentage was reported in the parenthesis. #Independent samples t-test was performed for the comparison while standard deviation (SD) of the respective data was reported in the parenthesis. Silver diammine fluoride solution. ΦSodium fluoride varnish. *Statistical significance level is set at 0.05 and value of statistical significance is emphasized in bold.