Table 3.

Summary of combinatorial immunodepletions modeled in the simulation

Components	No. mts bounda	Minus-end areaa	Conclusion	Table 1 concordance
D, H, M, E	26.4 ± 3.5	2.1 ± 0.8	Tightly focused	Yes
D, H, E	3.8 ± 2.1		No organization	Yes
D, M, E	5.1 ± 2.2		No organization	Yes
H, M, E	6.9 ± 3.1		No organization	Yes
D, H, M	22.7 ± 2.0	4.4 ± 0.6	Loosely focused	Yes
D, E	5.2 ± 3.0		No organization	Yes
H, E	2.2 ± 1.3		No organization	Yes
D, H	20.2 ± 3.6	5.0 ± 1.2	Loosely focused	Yes
D, M	21.9 ± 3.7	2.2 ± 0.5	Tightly focused	Yes
H, M	21.0 ± 2.9	2.6 ± 0.7	Tightly focused	Yes
M, E	2.2 ± 0.6		No organization	Yes
D	3.2 ± 0.9		No organization	N/A
H	2.4 ± 1.8		No organization	Yes
M	4.8 ± 2.8		No organization	Yes
E	0.7 ± 0.2		No organization	N/A

mts, microtubules.

^aTen trials of 30 microtubules each.