Skip to main content
. 2013 May 29;9(6):776–785. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst043

Table 1.

ROI group analysis mindfulness group > basic group

ROI (Coordinates x, y, z; BA) Cluster size eng > ent
euk > ent
png > pnt
mm3 t P (d) t P (d) t P (d)
Amygdala R (19, −8, −15; ) 729 −0.34 0.73 0.21 0.83 −2.34 0.024 (0.71)
Amygdala L (−19, −8, −15; ) 729 0.21 0.83 10.38 0.18 −1.32 0.19
Ant. Insula R (35, 15, 9; –) 3375 0.82 0.42 0.91 0.37 −0.61 0.95
Ant. Insula L (−35, 15, 9; –) 3375 2.31 0.03 (0.70) 3.10 0.00 (0.93) 0.11 0.91
DMPFC R (5, 6, 50; 6/8) 1000 2.26 0.03 (0.68) 2.02 0.05 (0.61) 0.10 0.92
DMPFC L (−5, 6, 50; 6/8) 1000 2.69 0.01 (0.81) 2.68 0.01 (0.81) 0.56 0.58
DLPFC R (35, 20, 28; 9/46) 3375 0.37 0.71 0.35 0.73 1.16 0.25
DLPFC L (−35, 20, 28; 9/46) 3375 2.80 0.01 (0.85) 1.72 0.09 0.59 0.56

ROI analysis of emotion expectation negative vs neutral (eng > ent) and ‘unknown’ vs neutral (euk > ent) and emotion perception negative vs neutral (png > pnt) in the mindfulness group compared with the basic group. Mean beta weights of the contrasts were compared between groups using 2-tailed student’s t-tests with 44 df. Results rounded (two digits). Significant differences are given in bold (P < 0.05), differences with a trend in italics (P < 0.1). Effect sizes for the significant differences are indicated in brackets.

ROI egde-length: 9 × 9 × 9 mm (amygdala), 10 × 10 × 10 mm (DMPFC), 15 × 15 × 15 mm (insula, DLPFC).

Ant., Anterior; DMPFC, Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex; DLPFC, Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex; R, right; L, left.