Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 2.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD000384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000384.pub2

Table 1. Suggested design of study.

Type of study Patients Interventions Outcomes Notes
Allocation: the randomisation process should be clearly described.
Double-blind evaluation of the outcomes of a lifestyle intervention is extremely difficult, and probably impossible. Trialists should, take every precaution to minimise the effect of biases by using blind or independent raters.
Intention-to-treat analysis is preferable. Trialists should describe from which groups with-drawals came, why they occurred and what was their outcome.
Duration: Two year follow-up at minimum.
Setting: in a situation where hospitalisation of people from schizophrenia tends to extend well beyond 28 days - perhaps in a low-middle income country setting
Diagnosis:
people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illnesses.
Age: all ages.
Sex: men & women.
N=300.*
History: people needing admission.
  1. Short stay policy: discharge planning for before day 28. N=150.

  2. Standard stay: discharge planning as before. N= 150.

Service outcomes: read-mission, use of day hospital.
Loss to follow up.
Functioning: including employment.
Serious events: any, list.
Satisfaction.
Quality of life.
Economic outcomes.
* Size of study with sufficient power to highlight ~10% difference between groups for primary outcome