2. Outcome data: engaged in sex.
| Study | Intervention group 1 | Intervention group 2 | Intervention group 3 | Statistical significance | Other |
| Dancy 2009 | Mother/Daughter HIV Risk Reduction intervention (MDRR) | Health Expert Risk Reduction intervention (HERR) | Mother/Daughter Health Promotion intervention (MDHP) | Statistical significance | Other |
| Engaged in sex (at T3, 6 months follow‐up) 1= yes |
‐0.46 | N/A | NS | Mean difference Group 1 versus Group 2 | |
| ‐0.71 | NS | Mean difference Group 1 and Group 2 combined versus Group 3 | |||
| DiClemente 2004; | HIV prevention intervention | General health promotion group | N/A | Statistical significance | Adjusted odds ratio or mean difference |
| Mean number of vaginal sex acts in past 6 months. 6 month follow‐up |
unadjusted 12.62 adjusted 14.23 |
unadjusted 13.80 adjusted 17.08 |
p‐value reported only for % relative change Group 1 versus Group 2 (data not extracted) | NR | |
| Mean number of vaginal sex acts in past 6 months. 12 month follow‐up |
unadjusted 14.32 adjusted 16.67 |
unadjusted 15.60 adjusted 17.94 |
p‐value reported only for % relative change Group 1 versus Group 2 (data not extracted) | NR | |
| Mean number of vaginal sex acts in past 6 months. For full 0 to 12 month period |
unadjusted 13.44 adjusted 15.82 |
unadjusted 14.72 adjusted 18.86 |
p‐value reported only for % relative change Group 1 versus Group 2 (data not extracted) | NR | |
| Downs 2004 | Interactive video intervention | Content‐matched control | Topic‐matched control | Statistical significance | Other |
| % self‐reporting sexual abstinence during previous 3 months (3 month follow‐up) |
20.0a | Data for groups 2 & 3 pooled for analysis 8.0a |
OR 2.50 P = 0.027 |
(Stated frequency of abstinence higher in interactive video intervention) | |
| % self‐reporting sexual abstinence during previous 3 months (6 month follow‐up) |
18.8a | Data for groups 2 & 3 pooled for analysis 11.1a |
OR 1.45 P = 0.344 |
(No difference between groups) | |
| Ferguson 1998 | Culturally specific peer‐led education and skills based pregnancy prevention programme | Individual‐led pregnancy prevention programme | N/A | Statistical significance | Other |
| Frequency of sexual intercourse in past 4 weeks (baseline)b n (%) 0 1 to 2 3 to 5 |
7 (88) 1 (12) 0 (0) |
6 (50) 3 (25) 3 (25) |
NR | ||
| Frequency of sexual intercourse in past 4 weeks (3 month follow‐up)b n (%) 0 1 to 2 3 to 5 |
7 (88) 0 (0) 1 (12) |
9 (75) 2 (16) 1 (08) |
NR | ||
| Never being sexually active n (%) (baseline) |
25 (76) | 18 (60) | |||
| Never being sexually active n (%) (post‐intervention) |
25 (76) | 18 (60) | |||
| Never being sexually active n (%) (3 month follow‐up) |
22 (73) | 10 (45) | |||
| Jaworski 2001 | Intervention‐Motivation‐Behavioural skills group (IMB) (n not reported) | Information‐only group (INFO) (n not reported) | Waiting list control (WLC) (n not reported) | Statistical significance | Other |
| Proportion who became sexually abstinent from baseline to 2 months follow‐up | 22% | 16% | 11% | P = 0.10 | |
| Shain 1999 | Behavioural‐cognitive intervention | Nurse practitioner‐led counselling | N/A | Statistical significance | Other |
| Percentage who had sex with an untreated or incompletely STI treated partner 0 to 6 months follow up |
10.0 | 16.7 | N/A | P = 0.03 | Unadjusted Chi‐square analysis |
| Percentage who had sex with an untreated or incompletely STI treated partner (data not collected for women who returned for 6‐month follow up) 0 to 12 months follow up |
10.0 | 16.7 | N/A | P = 0.03 | Unadjusted Chi‐square analysis |
NR = Not reported
NS = Not statistically significant
a Data estimated from a graph using a graphical measurement computer programme (Engauge); not reported whether this is a mean value
b Restricted to those sexually active at the start of the study (24% intervention group, 40% comparator group)