Skip to main content
. 2014 May 17;14:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-68

Table 1.

Cox proportional hazards regression models

 
Univariate regression models
Multiple regression model 1
Variable Hazard ratio (95% CI) p-value Hazard ratio (95% CI) p-value
OMT
0.40 (0.35,0.45)
<0.001
0.79 (0.72,0.87)
<0.001
Female gender
0.48 (0.40,0.57)
<0.001
0.75 (0.66,0.85)
0.001
Age [10 years]
0.60 (0.54,0.67)
<0.001
0.79 (0.73,0.85)
<0.001
>27 criminal days prior to OMT application
4.83 (4.19,5.55)
<0.001
1.50 (1.35,1.66)
<0.001
Criminal conviction while on waiting list
6.65 (5.70,7.76)
<0.001
2.84 (2.47,3.25)
<0.001
>1 OMT period
1.74 (1.33, 2.28)
<0.001
1.43 (1.20,1.70)
<0.001
Criminal conviction last 30 days 93.9 (87.1, 101.2) <0.001 45.2 (40.4, 50.5) <0.001

Cox proportional hazards regression models with day of criminal conviction as a recurrent event outcome and opoid maintenance treatment (OMT) a time-dependent explanatory variable. Results should be interpreted with care as the multiple model failed the assumption of proportional hazards.