Table 1.
Cox proportional hazards regression models
|
Univariate regression models |
Multiple regression model 1 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | p-value |
OMT |
0.40 (0.35,0.45) |
<0.001 |
0.79 (0.72,0.87) |
<0.001 |
Female gender |
0.48 (0.40,0.57) |
<0.001 |
0.75 (0.66,0.85) |
0.001 |
Age [10 years] |
0.60 (0.54,0.67) |
<0.001 |
0.79 (0.73,0.85) |
<0.001 |
>27 criminal days prior to OMT application |
4.83 (4.19,5.55) |
<0.001 |
1.50 (1.35,1.66) |
<0.001 |
Criminal conviction while on waiting list |
6.65 (5.70,7.76) |
<0.001 |
2.84 (2.47,3.25) |
<0.001 |
>1 OMT period |
1.74 (1.33, 2.28) |
<0.001 |
1.43 (1.20,1.70) |
<0.001 |
Criminal conviction last 30 days | 93.9 (87.1, 101.2) | <0.001 | 45.2 (40.4, 50.5) | <0.001 |
Cox proportional hazards regression models with day of criminal conviction as a recurrent event outcome and opoid maintenance treatment (OMT) a time-dependent explanatory variable. Results should be interpreted with care as the multiple model failed the assumption of proportional hazards.