Skip to main content
. 2014 May 12;111(21):E2162–E2171. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401150111

Table 3.

Results of attempts to replicate ages of proposed YDB layers for sites in Fig. 1, group 3a

Site Age of YDB originally reported Predicted age of proposed YDB layer, unweighted Age difference (column 3 minus column 2) Predicted age of proposed YDB layer, weighted Age difference (column 5 minus column 2)
Abu Hureyra* 12,900 13,082 182 13,044 144
12,658 −242 12,763 −137
Arlington Canyon 12,800 13,106 306 13,108 308
Barber Creek 12,800 12,100 −700 12,100 −700
Blackville 12,800 12,960 160 12,960 160
Blackwater Draw 12,900 12,860 −40 12,866 −34
Kimbel Bay 12,800 18,106 5,306 12,094 −706
Lake Cuitzeo 12,900 19,725 6,825 15,916 3,016
Melrose 12,900 12,300 −600
Murray Springs 12,900 12,847 −53 12,809 −91
Talega 12,800 13,030 230 13,030 230
Topper 12,800 11,773 −1,027 11,098 −1,702
*

Ages given for Abu Hureyra are for the reported 284.29 m and 284.70 m depths of the supposed YDB layer.

A weighted model is not possible for Melrose because one of the data points is the ground surface, not a date with an error term.