Table 3.
Grade Report for Each Outcome Evaluation Tool Assessed in This Critical Review. A Grade of “A” is the Highest and was Assigned Only When High-Quality Evidence Existed That the Tool Met the Accepted Standards for Good Performance. This was Followed by Grades “B” and “C”, or Grade “U” if Data for Evaluation did not Exist
| Outcome evaluation tool |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABEL | CHILD | COW | COSI–C | DIAL | ELF | FAPI | HABIT | IT-MAIS | LittlEARS | PEACH Diary | PEACH Rating Scale | |
| Conceptual clarity | B | A | B | C | A | B | A | B | B | A | B | B |
| Normative data | U | U | U | U | U | U | U | C | C | B | A | U |
| Measurement model | U | U | U | U | U | U | U | A | B | A | B | U |
| Item/Scale bias | U | U | U | U | U | U | U | U | U | A | A | U |
| Respondent burden | A | B | B | B | B | C | B | A | C | A | C | A |
| Administrative burden | A | A | B | B | C | C | B | A | C | A | C | B |
| Retest reliability | A | B | U | U | U | U | U | A | B | A | A | U |
| Discriminant validity | U | U | U | U | U | U | U | A | U | B | B | U |
| Convergent validity | A | C | U | U | B | C | C | A | A | A | B | U |
| Ecological validity | A | B | A | A | A | A | A | A | B | A | A | A |
| Responsiveness | A | B | U | U | U | U | U | A | B | U | A | U |
| Alternate/accessible forms | C | B | B | B | C | B | C | C | B | C | B | B |
| Other languages | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | A | B | C |