Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 2;8:346. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00346

Table 1.

Overview of the behavioural and cognitive findings from the DDP family risk study.

Findings
Longitudinal predictor of readinga
Longitudinal predictor of arithmetica
Who When Variable On its own After controlling for arithmetic On its own After controlling for reading Group differencesb Support for MDM?
Child Age 4 - not yet in school Nonverbal IQc FRD < FRND = C
Verbal IQc FRD < FRND < C
End kindergarten (age 5–6) Rapid namingd FRD < FRND = C
Phonological awarenessd FRD < FRND < C
Letter knowledged FRD < FRND = C
End Grade 2 (age 8) Rapid naminge FRD < FRND = C
Phonological awarenesse FRD < FRND < C
Word-reading accuracye FRD < FRND < C
Word-reading fluencye FRD < FRND < C
Pseudoword-reading fluencye FRD < FRND < C
Spellinge FRD < FRND < C
Dyslexic parent Rapid naminge FRD < FRND (< C)
Nonword repetitione FRD = FRND (< C)
Word-reading fluencye FRD < FRND (< C)
Pseudoword-reading fluencye FRD = FRND (< C)
Spellinge FRD = FRND (< C)
Self-reported literacy difficultiesd FRD = FRND (< C)
Non-dyslexic parent Self-reported literacy difficultiesd FRD < FRND (= C)
a

Reading = word-reading fluency, arithmetic = arithmetic fluency.

b

Dyslexia status was assessed using word-reading fluency at the end of Grade 2 or halfway Grade 3. Regarding the parents of the control children, the best-reading parent features in the non-dyslexic parent comparison, and the other in the dyslexic-parent comparisons.

e

Reported in van Bergen et al. (2012).

FRD = familial-risk dyslexia, FRND = familial-risk no-dyslexia, C = control, MDM = multiple deficit model.