Table 5. Three case scenario in which CV for 
and 
are≤3%.
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | |||||||
| Test 1 | Test 2 | CV (%) | Test 1 | Test 2 | CV (%) | Test 1 | Test 2 | CV (%) | |
<b> </b>(ml⋅min−1) |
1699 | 1628 | 3.0 | 1699 | 1628 | 3.0 | 1699 | 1699 | 0.0 |
 (ml⋅min−1) |
1450 | 1390 | 3.0 | 1390 | 1450 | 3.0 | 1390 | 1450 | 3.0 |
| RER | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.0 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 6.0 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 3.0 |
| Fatox (g⋅min−1) | 0.42 | 0.40 | 3.1 | 0.52 | 0.30 | 38.2 | 0.52 | 0.42 | 15.3 |
| CHOox (g⋅min−1) | 1.15 | 1.10 | 3.0 | 0.87 | 1.37 | 31.7 | 0.87 | 1.15 | 19.2 |
| 1-RER | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.1 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 35.3 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 15.3 |
| % ENEfat | 50.4 | 50.4 | 0.0 | 62.7 | 37.6 | 35.3 | 62.7 | 50.4 | 15.3 |
and 
, the values generated for the purpose of this study, are presented in bold. RER, Fatox, CHOox, 1-RER and % ENEfat were calculated. Case 1: CVs of 
and 
are 3% and the correlation coefficient between 
and 
is positive; case 2: CVs of 
and 
are 3% and the correlation coefficient between 
and 
is negative; case 3: CV 
is 0% and CV 
is 3%. When assuming CV 
0% and CV 
3%, similar results as for case 3 are obtained (data not shown). 
, oxygen uptake; 
, carbon dioxide production; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; Fatox, fat oxidation rate; CHOox, carbohydrate oxidation rate; % ENEfat, % energy derived from fat.