Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2014 Feb 17;26(2):539–554. doi: 10.1037/a0035951

Table 3.

Construct validity for the test scores from MABS across reporters for bicultural comfort, bicultural facility, bicultural advantages, and overall biculturalism. Construct validity measures were used as predictors of the latent variables of bicultural comfort, bicultural facility, bicultural advantages, and overall biculturalism. For the language items, English (use and pressures), Spanish (use and pressures), and the interaction between English and Spanish (use and pressures) were simultaneously entered into the model. The numbers reported are unstandardized path coefficients.

Bicultural Comfort Bicultural Facility Bicultural advantages Overall Biculturalism

Adol Moms Dads Adol Moms Dads Adol Moms Dads Adol Moms Dads
English Use .14+ .46*** .40*** .09* .25*** .23*** .11* .08** .32*** .13* .69*** .37***
Spanish Use .06 -.39*** -.24*** -.01 -.17*** -.12** .09** -.00 -.01 .04 -.17** -.12*
Lang Conflict -.06 -.06** -.03 -.06**
Eng Pressures -.50*** -.47*** -.33*** -.33*** -.12*** -.20*** -.40*** -.39***
Span Pressures .16 .28* .10 .03 -.03 -.01 .06 .06
Perceived Disc -.46*** -.24 -.10 -.18** -.24* -.07 .01 .07 -.20*** -.08 -.16* -.39***
Ethnic Identity .16* .25* .54*** .07+ .17* .32** .32*** .25*** .30** .19** .13 .40**

Note. Lang = Language, Eng = English, Span = Spanish; Disc = Discrimination.

+

p <.10,

*

p < .05,

**

p <.01,

***

p < .001