Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2014 Apr 14;28(3):380–390. doi: 10.1037/a0036458

Table 5.

Couples’ cancer conversations with each other and their relationship to patients’ and spouses’ psychological adjustment.

Depressive Symptoms Change Avoidance/ Intrusions Change

Patient Spouse Patient Spouse
Emotional Disclosure

 Patient 0.01 0.00 −0.61 0.14
 Spouse 0.00 −0.86 −1.25** −0.61
Informational Conversation

 Patient 0.16 0.17 −0.06 −0.05
 Spouse −0.37* −0.38 −0.05 −0.06
Supportive Interaction

 Patient 0.61* 0.02 −0.21 0.52
 Spouse 0.02 −0.13 −0.04 −0.21

Note. N = 52 couples. Numbers are standardized regression coefficients from Actor-Partner Inter-dependence Models, using multi-level modeling, and controlling for age and patients’ use of antidepressant medication. A threshold of p = .20 was used to deconstruct interactions between role (patient or spouse) and main effects, and display unequal coefficients for patients and spouses. For each APIM, 4 coefficients are displayed: an actor effect for the patient (in the upper left cell for each outcome) and spouse (lower right cell), and a partner effect for the patient (lower left cell) and spouse (upper right cell). “Change” in outcome measures are two-month follow-up scores residualized for baseline scores. Because the distribution of the frequency of cancer conversations was positively skewed, we also reanalyzed the data after a log10 transformation. The transformed results revealed that the interpretation of our results is unchanged, therefore the untransformed results are reported here.

*

p ≤ .05;

**

p ≤ .01