Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 2;9(6):e98006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098006

Figure 3. Pooled analysis of proportions from case series related to stratified morbidity.

Figure 3

Panel A: Acute myocardial infarction, Conventional care series; Panel B: Acute myocardial infarction, ERAS case series; Panel C: Renal failure, Conventional care series; Panel D: Renal failure, ERAS case series; Panel E: Stroke, Conventional care series; Panel F: Stroke, ERAS case series. An effect difference was seen due to the non-overlap of the 95% confidence intervals in relation to renal failure (favoring conventional care) and stroke (favoring ERAS). No effect difference was seen due to the overlap of the 95% confidence interval considering incidence of acute myocardial infarction.