Skip to main content
. 2014 May 20;13:46. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-46

Table 2.

Correlation coefficient matrix between VFA CT and predictor variables in the modeling group ( n = 152)

  VFA CT ARS 1 AS 1 SUS 1 BS 1 WC CS 1 WHR SS 1 Age CHS 1 BMI TS 1 HC THS 1 CAS 1 Wt Sex
ARS 1
.81**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AS 1
.80**
.86**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SUS 1
.76**
.82**
.78**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BS 1
.76**
.83**
.80**
.92**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WC
.75**
.63**
.56**
.57**
.58**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CS 1
.74**
.84**
.80**
.80**
.74**
.44**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WHR
.74**
.64**
.58**
.59**
.55**
.80**
.54**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SS 1
.72**
.76**
.83**
.73**
.74**
.48**
.74**
.48**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Age
.70**
.60**
.67**
.62**
.56**
.28**
.79**
.42**
.68**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CHS 1
.66**
.76**
.74**
.73**
.73**
.48**
.72**
.50**
.72**
.54**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BMI
.63**
.57**
.46**
.50**
.54**
.87**
.34**
.56**
.37**
.16**
.43**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TS 1
.57**
.68**
.69**
.66**
.59**
.31**
.74**
.37**
.56**
.37**
.16
.43**
 
 
 
 
 
 
HC
.54**
.44**
.38**
.38**
.44**
.87**
.22**
.39**
.34**
.09
.31**
.86**
.16*
 
 
 
 
 
THS 1
.49**
.59**
.65**
.61**
.56**
.25**
.69**
.34**
.69**
.64**
.66**
.11
.77**
.10
 
 
 
 
CAS 1
.45**
.54**
.61**
.55**
.50**
.20*
.67**
.28**
.65**
.62**
.61**
.10
.74**
.07
.85**
 
 
 
Wt
.44**
.38**
.22**
.35**
.35**
.77**
.15
.44**
.12
-.02
.18*
.84**
.09
.81**
-.10
-.08
 
 
Sex
-.06
-.06
-.23**
.01
-.07
.06
-.07
.10
-.31**
-.14
-.26**
.15
-.11
.01
-37**
-.22**
.48**
 
Ht -.13 -.18* -.30** -.13 -.18* .12 -.24** -.05 -.35** -.27** -.34** .06 -.23** .23** -.38** -.33** .58** .66**

1subcutaneous fat thickness; AS: abdominal skinfold, SS: suprailiac skinfold, ARS: armpit skinfold, TS: triceps skinfold, BS: back skinfold, SUS: subscapula skinfold, THS: thigh skinfold, CS: chest skinfold, CAS: calf skinfold, CHS: chin skinfold; WC: waist circumference; HC: hip circumference; WHR: waist-to-hip ration; Sex(0: female, 1: male); Ht, height; Wt, weight; BMI, body mass index; *, **.Correlation is significant at the 0.05, 0.01 level (2-tailed).