Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: Twin Res Hum Genet. 2008 Oct;11(5):481–487. doi: 10.1375/twin.11.5.481

Table 5.

Mean and Standard Deviations of Psychological Femininity in Female Twins From Same- Versus Opposite-Sex Pairs, for Entire Sample and the Reproductive Fitness (Over 50) Subsample

Same-sex pair Opposite sex pair
Mean SD N individuals Mean SD N individuals χ12 p
Australian
  Entire sample 13.62 3.14 3131 13.88 3.26 688 .01 .98
  over 50 13.25 3.06 299 13.93 3.06 143 4.51 .03
Dutch
  Entire sample 27.76 4.37 860 27.41 4.40 557 2.00 .16
  over 50 27.54 4.38 129 26.57 4.16 55 1.81 .18
US
  Entire sample 11.46 3.17 6190 11.53 3.11 1341 .50 .48
  over 50 11.75 3.12 1455 11.81 3.08 668 .17 .68

Note: p = probability based on t test of the difference between means; d = effect size, the effect on femininity of having a female twin, in SD units.