Table 3.
Condition | Combination | p-Value | Mean differenceb |
---|---|---|---|
GNHP | V2D1J6 | 0.009 | 3.57 |
V3D5J4 | 0.002 | 4.38 | |
V3D0J5 | 0.001 | 7.84 | |
V6D6J6 | 0.035 | 3.84 | |
V6D3J6 | 0.042 | 3.60 | |
GHP | V3D0J5 | 0.035 | 10.44 |
V5D3J2 | 0.015 | 3.26 | |
DLBCL | V1D1J6 | 0.011 | 1.30 |
Dominantc | |||
V1D4J3 | 0.000 | 4.94 | |
V4D6J4 | 0.046 | 2.70 | |
V5D1J4 | 0.001 | 1.80 | |
Dominantd | |||
V5D7J4 | 0.036 | 2.20 | |
V6D6J6 | 0.000 | 3.47 | |
V6D3J6 | 0.003 | 3.50 |
aThere were no VDJ combinations that where over-expressed in MALT-L samples, thus MALT-L does not appear in the table.
bRepresents the value of log2(observed/expected).
cThis combination was found in DLBCL samples number 1, 2, 3 (sample numbers according to Table S1 in Supplementary Material). The dominant combinations are those that appeared in the largest clone in each sample.
dThis combination was found in DLBCL sample number 5.