Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 3;5:264. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00264

Table 3.

VDJ combinations that were over-expressed in each conditiona.

Condition Combination p-Value Mean differenceb
GNHP V2D1J6 0.009 3.57
V3D5J4 0.002 4.38
V3D0J5 0.001 7.84
V6D6J6 0.035 3.84
V6D3J6 0.042 3.60
GHP V3D0J5 0.035 10.44
V5D3J2 0.015 3.26
DLBCL V1D1J6 0.011 1.30
Dominantc
V1D4J3 0.000 4.94
V4D6J4 0.046 2.70
V5D1J4 0.001 1.80
Dominantd
V5D7J4 0.036 2.20
V6D6J6 0.000 3.47
V6D3J6 0.003 3.50

aThere were no VDJ combinations that where over-expressed in MALT-L samples, thus MALT-L does not appear in the table.

bRepresents the value of log2(observed/expected).

cThis combination was found in DLBCL samples number 1, 2, 3 (sample numbers according to Table S1 in Supplementary Material). The dominant combinations are those that appeared in the largest clone in each sample.

dThis combination was found in DLBCL sample number 5.