Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun;52(6):2166–2168. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00374-14

TABLE 1.

Comparison of sensitivities and specificities of manual/LS swab to WASP/ESwab for the recovery of S. agalactiae

Method and swab type No. with indicated test result
Total no. Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
True positive False positive True negative False negative
Direct plating
    Manual/LS swab 28 0 65 4a 97 87.5 100.0
    WASP/ESwab 30 0 65 2b 97 93.8 100.0
Enrichment culture
    Manual/LS swab 29 0 65 3c 97 90.6 100.0
    WASP/ESwab 31 0 65 1d 97 96.9 100.0
a

One was positive by manual/LS Swab following LIM enrichment culture and was positive by WASP/ESwab on direct and enriched culture. Two remained negative by manual/LS Swab following LIM enrichment culture and were positive by WASP/ESwab on direct and enriched culture. One remained negative by manual/LS Swab following LIM enrichment culture and was positive by WASP/ESwab on direct culture only.

b

Two were positive by both manual/LS Swab and WASP/ESwab following LIM enrichment culture.

c

Three were positive by WASP/ESwab on direct culture.

d

One was negative by manual/LS Swab following direct and LIM enrichment culture and positive by WASP/ESwab on direct culture only.