Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun;52(6):1818–1823. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03553-13

TABLE 4.

Xpert MTB/RIF performance classified by specimen appearance, centrifuged specimens, and othera

Specimen category and group No. (%) of specimens tested No. of specimens classified by:
No. of specimens with definitive results confirmed by reference culture % sensitivity (95% CI) % specificity (95% CI)
MGIT culture
Xpert MTB/RIF
Positive Negative Contaminated Positiveb Negative Error
Appearance
    Clear (watery) 292 (25) 62 201 29 51 240 1 262 48 (36 to 61) 93 (89 to 96)
    Bloody 10 (0.9) 0 9 1 1 9 0
    Thick 255 (22) 62 131 62 92 162 1 192 87 (76 to 94) 85 (77 to 90)
    Trace of blood 618 (53) 153 433 32 116 498 4 582 52 (44 to 60) 93 (91 to 96)
Centrifuge treatment
    Not centrifuged 1,004 (850) 241 673 90 206 792 6 908 57 (50 to 63) 94 (91 to 95)
    Centrifuged on receipt 171 (14.6) 36 101 34 54 117 0 137 75 (58 to 89) 81 (72 to 88)
Treatment with sheep blood agar followed by NALC-NaOHc
    Aspirate 8 (22) 5 3 1 7
    Fluid 12 (33) 2 8 2 2 10
    Pus 8 (22) 3 2 3 4 4
    Tissue 8 (22) 5 3 8
a

A total of 1,175 specimens were tested. A total of 124 samples (10.5% of 1,175 samples), including 9 aspirate samples, 1 bone sample, 1 CSF sample, 5 urine samples, 72 fluid samples, 27 pus samples, and 9 tissue biopsy samples, were classified as contaminated by MGIT culture testing. Xpert MTB/RIF classified 35 (28%) of these as positive and 89 (72%) of these as negative.

b

Data include all RIF results (RIF sensitive, RIF resistant, and RIF indeterminate).

c

A total of 36 samples were subjected to 24 h of bacterial growth on sheep blood agar followed by NALC-NaOH treatment.