Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;21(2):137–146. doi: 10.1111/acem.12315

Table 3.

Diagnostic Test Characteristics of NVS, REALM-R, SILS, and Numeracy Tests (N=435)

Instrument Sensitivity % (95% CI) Specificity % (95% CI) Positive Likelihood Ratio (95% CI) Negative Likelihood Ratio (95% CI)
NVS ≤ 3, n=428 98.0 (93.1-99.8) 45.7 (40.3-51.3) 1.81 (1.51-2.17) 0.04 (0.01-0.17)
REALM-R ≤ 6, n=433 80.8 (73.2-88.3) 61.7 (56.5-67.0) 2.14 (1.64-2.80) 0.30 (0.19-0.46)
Numeracy ≤ 1 80.8 (73.2-88.3) 50.2 (44.8-55.5) 1.61 (1.30-2.01) 0.38 (0.24-0.60)
SILS ≤ 12, n=433 68.0 (59.0-77.07) 75.5 (70.8-80.1) 2.78 (1.92-4.02) 0.42 (0.31-0.57)
Help Reading, n=433
 1 – Always 9.7 (4.0-15.4) 98.8 (96.9-99.7) 7.42 (1.13-48.89) 0.92 (0.86-0.98)
 2 – Often 16.5 (9.3-23.7) 97.0 (95.1-98.8) 5.30 (1.59-17.64) 0.87 (0.79-0.95)
 3 – Sometimes 42.7 (33.2-52.3) 85.5 (81.7-89.3) 2.81 (1.65-4.78) 0.69 (0.58-0.83)
 4 – Rarely 49.5 (39.9-59.2) 66.1 (61.0-71.2) 1.49 (1.06-2.08) 0.75 (0.59-0.96)
 5 – Never 100 0.00 1.00 --
 Dichotomized* 42.7 (33.2-52.3) 85.5 (81.7-89.3) 2.81 (1.65-4.78) 0.69 (0.58-0.81)
Medical Form Help
 1 – Not at all 14.4 (7.7-21.2) 98.5 (97.2-99.8) 9.93 (1.90-52.03) 0.86 (0.79-0.94)
 2 – A little bit 30.8 (21.9-39.6) 94.6 (92.1-97.0) 5.69 (2.38-13.59) 0.73 (0.64-0.84)
 3 – Somewhat 54.8 (45.2-64.4) 80.4 (76.1-84.6) 2.78 (1.80-4.29) 0.57 (0.45-0.72)
 4 – Quite a bit 74.0 (65.6-82.5) 55.9 (50.5-61.2) 1.69 (1.32-2.17) 0.45 (0.31-0.66)
 5 – Extremely 1.00 0.00 1.00 --
 Dichotomized* 54.8 (45.2-64.4) 80.4 (76.1-84.6) 2.78 (1.80-4.29) 0.57 (0.45-0.72)
Ability To Read
 1 – Very poor or terrible 6.7 (1.9-11.6) 100.0 (98.9-100.0)
 2 – Poor 14.4 (7.7-21.2) 99.1 (97.4-99.8) 16.56 (2.01-136.46) 0.86 (0.79-0.93)
 3 – Okay 40.4 (31.0-49.8) 95.5 (93.2-97.7) 8.58 (3.36-21.87) 0.64 (0.55-0.76)
 4 – Good 72.1 (63.5-80.7) 75.2 (70.6-80.0) 2.83 (1.97-4.08) 0.40 (0.29-0.55)
 5 – Excellent or very good 1.00 0.00 1.00 --
 Dichotomized* 40.4 (31.0-49.8) 95.5 (92.2-97.7) 8.58 (3.36-21.87) 0.64 (0.55-0.76)
Physician gestalt, n=309: inadequate or marginally adequate 52.7 (41.3-64.1) 70.6 (64.8-76.5) 1.72 (1.20-2.47) 0.70 (0.55-0.89)
*

Dichotomization used the following groupings: help reading (always/often as adequate, other responses as inadequate), medical form help (not at all/a little bit as adequate, other responses as inadequate), ability to read (excellent/very good/good as adequate, other responses as inadequate).

REALM-R = Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Revised; NVS = Newest Vital Sign; SILS = Single Item Literacy Screens