Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Rev Mol Med. 2011 Mar 23;13:e9. doi: 10.1017/S1462399411001797

TABLE 1. Overview of the utility of selected candidate electrophysiological intermediate phenotypes in ADHD.

This table summarises the findings following a systematic review of the literature, described in this paper. Databases Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO and EMBASE were searched using combinations of the key words EEG, ERP, electrophysiology, heritability, twin, family, endophenotype, genetic, ADHD within each selected domain. The computer search was supplemented with bibliographic cross-referencing.

Intermediate phenotype Association with ADHD Heritability Familial/genetic overlap with ADHD Genetic associations with ADHD risk variants

EEG power ↑ theta
↓beta
↑theta-beta ratio
High High familial correlations for theta and beta in multiply affected families (not unaffected relatives) SLC6A3
DRD4
Partially inconsistent Consistent Limited Consistent

EEG power: very low frequency fluctuations ↓power at rest
↓rest-task attenuation
Unknown Unknown Unknown
Limited

EEG: coherence and connectivity ↑ inter- and intrahemispheric coherence Moderate ↑ alpha asymmetry in first-degree relatives indicating familial risk factor COMT
Serotonin 1A receptor
Partially inconsistent Partially inconsistent Limited Limited

ERP: Inhibitory and attentional processing ↓ go-P3 amplitude
↓ no-go-P3 amplitude
↓ cue-P3
↓ CNV
↓ no-go-anteriorisation
↓ N2
Moderate ↓ P3 not familial or associated with familial risk for broader externalising conditions
↓ no-go-P3, cue-P3 and CNV demonstrate familial association with ADHD
SLC6A3
DRD2
DRD4
COMT
TPH2
Partially inconsistent Consistent Partially inconsistent Consistent

ERP: Performance monitoring ↓ error negativity
↓ error positivity
↓ N2
Moderate ↓ error negativity
↓ error positivity
↓ N2
demonstrated in non-affected first-degree relatives
SLC6A3
DRD4
COMT
5-HTTLPR
Inconsistent Limited Limited Consistent

Key: Unknown: Genetically sensitive designs are required to confirm utility.

Inconsistent: Multiple parameters/studies within the domain demonstrate non-replication. Confounding effects of sample and paradigm differences and presence of subtypes and comorbid conditions must be explored.

Partially inconsistent: A small number of parameters/studies within the domain demonstrate non-replication. Confounding effects of sample and paradigm differences and presence of subtypes and comorbid conditions must be explored.

Limited: Promising consistency but further replication is required due to a limited number of studies.

Consistent: To date fulfils this criterion for a potential intermediate phenotype of ADHD but further work in ADHD samples is required.