Table 3.
Surfactant | Flux (mg/hr-cm2) (mean and SD) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAN | DCAN | TCAN | BCAN | DBAN | CH | |
No surfactanta | 0.083±0.012 | 0.10±0.022 | 0.079±0.014 | 0.12±0.018 | 0.15±0.024 | 0.037±0.0061 |
SLES | 0.18±0.029b | 0.25±0.071b | 0.094±0.013 | 0.10±0.016 | 0.18±0.027 | 0.025±0.0042 |
SLS | 0.21±0.054b | 0.71±0.182b,c | 0.085±0.011 | 0.14±0.019 | 0.17±0.026 | 0.082±0.012b |
The skin was exposed to 1 mg/l of the HANs and 10 mg/l of CH solutions with or without the surfactants sodium laureth sulfate (SLES) and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS; n=3).
Same data as in Table 2 for 37 °C.
These means were found to be significantly higher at the flux with no surfactant at the 5% level using the Newman–Keuls test that tests multiple means.
This mean was found to be significantly higher than the SLES mean at the 5% level using the Newman–Keuls test.