Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 6;10(85):20130336. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0336

Table 2.

Measurements (mean ± s.e.) (µm) in non-drinking, transition and drinking regions (1, 2 and 3, respectively) of butterfly proboscises (figure 5). Means in columns within species followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; Tukey-HSD)

Species n feeding guild region dorsal legulae width (upper branch only) single galea width
Danaus plexippus 7 nectar 1 21.5 ± 1.0c 124.1 ± 1.4a
2 31.7 ± 1.5b 117.3 ± 1.6b
3 42.4 ± 1.3a 107.6 ± 0.7c
Papilio glaucus 4 nectar 1 39.7 ± 1.5c 167.3 ± 3.5a
2 50.5 ± 1.6b 156.2 ± 3.1b
3 57.9 ± 1.7a 133.6 ± 3.0c
Vanessa cardui 4 nectar 1 12.3 ± 0.6c 109.3 ± 3.3a
2 19.2 ± 1.6b 101.9 ± 2.6a
3 33.0 ± 1.7a 92.6 ± 1.5b
Polygonia interrogationis 6 sap 1 13.9 ± 0.4c 148.7 ± 2.8a
2 34.1 ± 2.3b 125.5 ± 1.5b
3 56.9 ± 0.6a 105.2 ± 1.1c
Limenitis arthemis astyanax 4 sap 1 18.2 ± 2.6c 261.1 ± 2.6a
2 68.0 ± 4.8b 237.3 ± 3.0b
3 92.4 ± 1.3a 188.7 ± 3.3c