Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 11;35(6):1284–1291. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgu034

Table II.

Individual SNPs associated with recurrence risk in NSCLC patients treated with curative therapy

SNP Gene Chr MAF SNP location Allelic change Overall
Best model HR (95% CI)a P value q value
rs2536182 WNT16 7 0.48 3′ flanking G>C Dominant 0.49 (0.33–0.73) 3.87×10−4 0.067
rs7296283 LRP6 12 0.18 5′ flanking G>A Dominant 1.84 (1.24–2.72) 2.30×10−3 0.188
rs10898563 FZD4 11 0.37 3′ UTR A>G Recessive 2.00 (1.26–3.17) 3.30×10−3 0.188
SNP Surgery-only Surgery and chemotherapy
Best model HR (95% CI)b P value q value Best model HR (95% CI)b P value q value
rs2536182 Dominant 0.47 (0.28–0.80) 5.24×10−3 0.154 Dominant 0.64 (0.27–1.53) 0.3554 0.259
rs10898563c Recessive 2.98 (1.60–5.35) 4.31×10−4 0.105 Dominant 0.60 (0.29–1.22) 0.1554 0.259
rs11725638d Dominant 1.29 (0.75–2.22) 0.3486 0.368 Dominant 0.31 (0.14–0.67) 3.05×10−3 0.242

Underlined bold numbers denote significant association at q < 0.1. MAF, minor allele frequency; UTR, untranslated region.

aAdjusted for sex, age, race, clinical stage, pack year tobacco history and treatment regimen.

bAdjusted for sex, age, race, clinical stage and pack year tobacco history.

cTop SNP in surgery-only group.

dTop SNP in surgery and chemotherapy group.