Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Aug 22;121(1):270–275. doi: 10.1037/a0024706

Table 2.

Hangover Sensitivity Predicting Average Daily Drinking Volume (ADV), Number of Drinking Problems, and Meeting AUDIT-Positive Criteria at Follow up: Regression Results

Predicting ADV at Time 2 (Model F(5,128) = 8.05, p < .0001)
Predictor Beta sr2 F(1,128)

Gender (male) 0.35 .03 9.25*
Age at Time 2 −0.10 .00 0.68
Employed at Time 2 0.16 .00 0.62
Time 1 ADV 0.33 .18 29.10 **
Alcohol Hangover Scale score 0.06 .00 0.45

Predicting number of AUDIT Problems at Time 2 (Model F(5,125) = 2.15, p < .07)
Predictor Beta sr2 F(1,128)

Gender (male) −0.11 .00 0.05
Age at Time 2 −0.36 .00 0.65
Employed at Time 2 0.61 .01 0.78
Time 1 ADV 0.56 .05 6.95**
Alcohol Hangover Scale score −0.31 .01 1.07

Predicting AUDIT Positive at Time 2 (Model Wald Χ2 (5, N = 131) = 10.15, p < .07)
Predictor Odds Ratio Wald Χ2 (df = 1)

Gender (male) 1.44 (0.69 – 3.00) 0.95
Age at Time 2 0.97 (0.52 – 1.79) 0.01
Employed at Time 2 1.92 (0.73 – 5.04) 1.76
Time 1 ADV 1.42 (1.03 – 1.96) 4.46 *
Alcohol Hangover Scale score 0.68 (0.44 – 1.06) 2.87

p = .09;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .001

ADV = Average daily volume (number of standard drinks)

AUDIT Problems = Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, problem items only

AUDIT Positive = Score of 8 or more on AUDIT