Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Aug 14;19(10):3185–3191. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2547-4

TABLE 3.

Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the effects of listed variables on recurrence-free survival

Variable Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95 % CI) P HR (95 % CI) P
Group
 No CALND vs. CALND 1.40 (0.65–2.99) 0.387 1.20 (0.55–2.62) 0.643
Age
 Per 1-year increase 0.97 (0.94–1.00) 0.089
Race
 Black vs. White 1.23 (0.52–2.89) 0.639
 Other vs. White 2.47 (0.58–10.6) 0.221
Tumor size
 T2–4 vs. T1 1.83 (0.89–3.74) 0.098
Tumor histology
 Lobular vs. ductal 0.25 (0.03–1.86) 0.177
 Others vs. ductal 0.22 (0.03–1.63) 0.139
ER status
 Positive vs. negative 0.19 (0.09–0.40) <0.0001 0.20 (0.10–0.41) <0.0001
PR status
 Positive vs. negative 0.26 (0.12–0.56) 0.0005
Her-2neu status
 Amplified vs. not 1.34 (0.60–3.04) 0.478
Tumor grade
 Grade II vs. grade I 7.85 (1.02–60.30) 0.048
 Grade III vs. grade I 19.70 (2.62–147.94) 0.004
Lymphovascular invasion
 Present vs. absent 2.13 (1.02–4.42) 0.043 2.11 (1.00–4.47) 0.051
Micrometastatic SLN
 Micro- vs. macrometastatic 0.66 (0.27–1.60) 0.353
Surgical therapy
 Mastectomy vs. BCT 1.49 (0.73–3.06) 0.276
Axillary radiation therapy
 Yes vs. no 1.63 (0.59–4.47) 0.347

CALND completion axillary lymph node dissection, ER estrogen receptor, PR progesterone receptor, SLN sentinel lymph node, BCT breast-conservation therapy