TABLE 1.
Comparison of compound-specific carbon isotope enrichment factor ɛ to the ɛintrinsic calculated for the carbon atoms at the molecular site of the reaction of the respective substratea
Bacterial strain or culture | Substrate | ɛ | ɛintrinsic | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Thauera aromatica | Toluene | −1.7 | −11.9 | 17 |
Geobacter metallireducens | Toluene | −1.8 | −12.6 | 17 |
Sulfate-reducing strain TRM1 | Toluene | −1.7 | −11.9 | 17 |
Desulfobacterium cetonicum | Toluene | −2.2 | −15.4 | 18 |
Sulfate-reducing enrichment culture | Toluene | −0.8 | −5.6 | 1 |
Methanogenic enrichment culture | Toluene | −0.5 | −3.5 | 1 |
Sulfate-reducing strain OX39 | m-Xylene | −1.8 | −14.4 | This study |
Sulfate-reducing strain OX39 | o-Xylene | −1.5 | −12.0 | This study |
Desulfobacterium cetonicum | m-Cresol | −3.9 | −27.3 | This study |
Desulfobacterium cetonicum | p-Cresol | −1.6 | −11.2 | This study |
Sulfate-reducing enrichment culture | 2-Methylnaphthalene | −0.9 | −9.9 | 9 |
Avg | −1.67 ± 0.86 | −12.3 ± 5.8 |
Average and
± standard deviations were calculated from the sum of all data presented in the table.