Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Eng Phys. 2014 May 17;36(7):975–980. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.04.003

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of the mRMR, MRF and SFS methods for raw EMG feature selection. The SFS method was based on individual raw EMG features. The average overall classification accuracy across all subjects was presented as a function of the number of selected TD or AR+RMS features using the three methods, respectively.