Table 1. Comparison between the standard occupancy model [28] and the model using spatial replicates with potential auto-correlation of sign detections among them [54] used to generate estimates of dhole habitat occupancy at landscape scale (Western Ghats, India, 2006–2007) and habitat-use at reserve scale (Bandipur Tiger Reserve, India, 2012).
AIC | ΔAIC | AIC weight | Model Likelihood | K* | Deviance | ||
Model | |||||||
Landscape-scale occupancy | ΨL (.) θ0L (.) θ1L (.) pt(L) (.) | 975.47 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 965.47 |
ΨL (.) p(L) (.) | 1005.91 | 30.44 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 999.91 | |
Reserve-scale occupancy | Ψs (.) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) | 991.27 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 981.27 |
Ψs (.) ps (.) | 1508.67 | 517.4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1502.67 |
*K = number of parameters.