Table 5. Estimates of β coefficient values for different individual habitat covariates hypothesized to influence dhole distribution ΨL at landscape scale (Western Ghats, India, 2006–2007).
(SE)
|
(SE)
|
(SE)
|
(SE)
|
|
| Model | ||||
| ΨL (chital+livestock) θ0L (.) θ1L (.) pt(L) (allprey) | 1.38 (1.11) | 4.52 (3.01) | - | −1.18 (0.94) |
| ΨL (chital) θ0L (.) θ1L (.) pt(L) (allprey) | 1.26 (1.04) | 4.05 (2.81) | - | - |
| ΨL (chital+sambar) θ0L (.) θ1L (.) pt(L) (allprey) | 1.57 (1.30) | 4.84 (3.41) | 0.99 (1.29) | - |
| ΨL (chital+sambar+livestock) θ0L (.) θ1L (.) pt(L) (allprey) | 1.50 (1.17) | 4.85 (3.20) | 0.56 (1.06) | −1.00 (0.94) |
| ΨL (.) θ0L (.) θ1L (.) pt(L) (allprey) | 1.21 (1.46) | - | - | - |
| ΨL (livestock) θ0L (.) θ1L (.) pt(L) (allprey) | 1.50 (2.11) | - | - | −1.63 (2.30) |
| ΨL (sambar) θ0L (.) θ1L (.) pt(L) (allprey) | 2.27 (4.11) | - | 4.47 (9.48) | - |
| Model averaged values | 1.42 (1.28) | 4.05 (2.8) | 0.40 (0.73) | −0.53 (0.56) |
These include model-averaged β estimates with unconditional standard errors.