Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 3;9(6):e98803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098803

Table 7. Estimates of β coefficient values for different individual habitat covariates hypothesized to influence dhole habitat-use Ψs at reserve scale (Bandipur Tiger Reserve, India, 2012).

Inline graphic (SE) Inline graphic (SE) Inline graphic (SE) Inline graphic (SE) Inline graphic (SE)
Model
Ψs (.) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) 0.88 (0.57) - - - -
Ψs (livestock) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) 0.85 (0.58) - - - −0.96 (0.76)
Ψs (sambar) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) 1.11 (0.89) - 1.35 (1.83) - -
Ψs (sambar+livestock) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) 1.00 (0.75) - 1.09 (1.53) - −0.93 (0.78)
Ψs (allprey) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) 0.92 (0.61) - - 0.29 (0.78) -
Ψs (chital) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) 0.90 (0.60) 0.17 (0.92) - - -
Ψs (allprey+livestock) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) 0.88 (0.62) - - 0.22 (0.80) −0.94 (0.76)
Ψs (chital+livestock) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) 0.89 (0.61) 0.12 (0.93) - - −0.96 (0.76)
Model averaged values 0.96 (0.68) 0.02 (0.15) 0.32 (0.50) 0.05 (0.16) −0.43 (0.42)

These include model-averaged β estimates with unconditional standard errors.