Table 7. Estimates of β coefficient values for different individual habitat covariates hypothesized to influence dhole habitat-use Ψs at reserve scale (Bandipur Tiger Reserve, India, 2012).
(SE) | (SE) | (SE) | (SE) | (SE) | |
Model | |||||
Ψs (.) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) | 0.88 (0.57) | - | - | - | - |
Ψs (livestock) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) | 0.85 (0.58) | - | - | - | −0.96 (0.76) |
Ψs (sambar) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) | 1.11 (0.89) | - | 1.35 (1.83) | - | - |
Ψs (sambar+livestock) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) | 1.00 (0.75) | - | 1.09 (1.53) | - | −0.93 (0.78) |
Ψs (allprey) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) | 0.92 (0.61) | - | - | 0.29 (0.78) | - |
Ψs (chital) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) | 0.90 (0.60) | 0.17 (0.92) | - | - | - |
Ψs (allprey+livestock) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) | 0.88 (0.62) | - | - | 0.22 (0.80) | −0.94 (0.76) |
Ψs (chital+livestock) θ0s (.) θ1s (.) pt(s) (.) | 0.89 (0.61) | 0.12 (0.93) | - | - | −0.96 (0.76) |
Model averaged values | 0.96 (0.68) | 0.02 (0.15) | 0.32 (0.50) | 0.05 (0.16) | −0.43 (0.42) |
These include model-averaged β estimates with unconditional standard errors.