Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Nov;41(6):737–749. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0515-3

Table 1. Organizational, director, supervisor, and staff characteristics (N = 122).

Variable M (SD) or % Response format
Organization
 CMT 3.33 (1.23) How often is CMT provided?
 MAT 1.75 (1.27) How often is MAT provided?
 State licensure 95.1 1 = yes, 0 = no
 TJC accreditation 16.7 1 = yes, 0 = no
 Public funding 67.0 (38.0) Percentage of public funding in total budget
 Medicaid 69.0 Percentage of programs accepting Medicaid
 Private insurance 48.0 Percentage of programs accepting private insurance
 Parent organization 35.3 1 = yes, 0 = no
Director and staff
 Director leadership 3.90 (0.69) 9 items (e.g., Does management inspire others with plans for facility's future?)
 Staff resources for change 4.03 (0.39) 5 subscales (offices, staffing, training, equipment, Internet)
 Staff education 35.08 (39.20) Percentage of treatment staff with graduate degree
Clinical supervisor
 Field tenure 12.90 (9.40) Years of experience in drug abuse counseling
 Education 31.5 1 = graduate degree, 0 = no graduate degree
Attitudes toward EBP
 Openness 3.32 (0.73) 4 items (e.g., I like to use new types of therapy)
 Regulation 3.91 (0.93) 3 items (e.g., Would you adopt a new therapy if required?)
 Appeal 3.58 (0.76) 4 items (e.g., Would you adopt a new therapy if it was intuitively appealing?)
 Divergence 2.20 (0.65) 4 items (e.g., I know better than academic researchers how to care for clients)
Attributes for change 4.02 (0.43) 5 subscales (growth, efficacy, influence, orientation, adaptability)

Note Items on all scales have a range of 1 to 5. CMT contingency management treatment, MAT medication-assisted treatment, TJC the joint commission