Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006 Dec 1;43(0 1):S23–S35. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000248342.05438.52

TABLE 2.

Stratified Analyses of Aggregated Effect Sizes for 95% Adherence and Undetectable Viral Load Outcomes

95% Adherence
Undetectable Viral Load
k OR (95% CI) k OR (95% CI)
Study and sample characteristics
 Conducted in United States 13 1.30 (0.96 to 1.71)23,25,31,33,35,3638,4244,48,49 9 1.06 (0.75 to 1.51)23,25,31,33,35,38,39,42,43
 Conducted elsewhere 5 1.89 (1.28 to 2.82)24,32,34,40,41 5 1.45 (1.04 to 2.02)24,32,34,40,41
 80% or more participants male 8 1.21 (0.79 to 1.84)25,35,37,40,41,43,44,49 6 1.24 (0.75 to 2.05)25,35,3941,43
 Less than 80% of participants male 10 1.65 (1.16 to 2.34)23,24,3134,36,38,42,48 8 1.26 (0.96 to 1.65)23,24,31,33,34,38,42
 50% or more participants MSM 5 1.76 (0.87 to 3.57)25,35,37,40,44 4 1.83 (0.50 to 6.67)25,35,39,40
 Less than 50% of participants MSM 5 1.21 (0.79 to 1.84)24,33,42,43,48 4 1.15 (0.78 to 1.71)24,33,42,43
 HAART naive 3 1.33 (0.73 to 2.43)24,35,42 3 1.22 (0.94 to 1.58)24,35,42
 Not HAART naive 15 1.52 (1.22 to 2.07)23,25,3134,38,40,41,48,49 11 1.66 (0.70 to 3.94)23,25,3134,3841,43
 No marker for poor baseline adherence 14 1.70 (1.02 to 2.86)2325,31,32,3436,38,4043,48 13 1.29 (0.99 to 1.68)2325,31,3335,3843
 Marker for poor baseline adherence 4 2.09 (1.18 to 3.69)33,37,44,49 1 __33
 No marker for baseline detectable VL 15 1.42 (1.07 to 1.87)23,25,31,3338,40,41,43,44,48,49 11 1.19 (0.90 to 1.58)23,25,31,3335,3841,43
 Marker for baseline detectable VL 3 1.83 (0.94 to 3.59)24,32,42 3 1.43 (0.91 to 2.24)24,32,42
Intervention characteristics and components
 Delivered by study staff 9 1.74 (1.26 to 2.40)23,25,31,3335,37,42,49 8 1.25 (0.91 to 1.71)23,25,31,3335,39,42
 Not delivered by study staff 9 1.35 (0.89 to 5.05)24,32,36,38,40,41,43,44,50 6 1.26 (0.87 to 1.82)24,32,38,40,41,43
 5 or more intervention sessions 6 1.49 (0.82 to 2.74)23,25,31,40,48,49 5 1.24 (0.76 to 2.04)23,25,31,35,36(23,25,31,39,40)
 Fewer than 5 sessions 10 1.49 (1.13 to 1.98)24,3237,4144 7 1.26 (0.96 to 1.65)24,32,34,35,4143
 Didactic information on HAART 7 1.86 (1.25 to 2.79)25,32,36,38,40,43,48 7 1.41 (1.03 to 1.93)24,25,31,32,34,39,41
 No didactic information on HAART 11 1.26 (0.94 to 1.68)23,24,31,3335,37,41,42,44,49 7 1.06 (0.73 to 1.54)23,33,35,38,4043
 Interactive discussion of cognitions,
  motivations, and expectations
  about adherence
14 1.62 (1.21 to 2.03)24,25,3137,40,42,43,48,49 11 1.30 (1.00 to 1.70)24,25,3135,39,40,42,43
 No interactive discussion of cognitions,
  motivations, and expectations
  about adherence
4 0.99 (0.55 to 1.79)23,38,41,44 3 1.07 (0.62 to 1.86)23,38,41
 Behavioral strategies 15 1.34 (1.03 to 1.75)2325,31,3337,4043,48,49 12 1.28 (0.98 to 1.68)2325,3135,38,4043
 No behavioral strategies 3 2.31 (1.41 to 3.79)32,38,44 2 1.16 (0.70 to 1.92)32,38
 External reminder (eg, pager) 4 1.00 (0.62 to 1.63)32,41,44,37 4 1.15 (0.72 to 1.86)38,39,41,43
 No external reminder 14 1.69 (1.24 to 2.29)2325,3137,40,42,48,49 10 1.29 (0.98 to 1.70)2325,3135,40,42
 Involved only 1 intervention component 3 1.05 (0.45 to 2.46)23,38,44 1 __38
 Involved (any) 2 intervention components 9 1.77 (1.18 to 2.67)3133,35,36,40,42,48,49 6 1.19 (0.84 to 1.69)3134,40
 Involved (any) 3 intervention components 6 1.33 (0.92 to 1.95)24,25,34,37,41,43 5 1.35 (0.94 to 1.93)24,25,34,41
 Involved all 4 intervention components 1 1 __39
 Control received an intervention component 8 1.30 (0.90 to 1.88)33,3537,43,48,49 5 1.19 (0.80 to 1.78)33,35,39,42,43
 Control received standard of care or
  was wait-listed
10 1.75 (1.25 to 2.43)2325,31,32,34,38,40,41,44 9 1.29 (0.96 to 1.74)2325,31,32,34,38,40,41
Methodologic quality variables
 Baseline N ≥ 50 per arm 8 1.43 (0.99 to 2.04)24,3234,4143,48 7 1.31 (1.01 to 1.69)24,3234,4143
 Baseline N < 50 per arm 10 1.73 (1.09 to 2.73)23,25,31,3638,40,44,49 7 1.00 (0.54 to 1.84)23,25,31,35,3840
 Self-report adherence measure 11 1.39 (0.92 to 1.13)24,25,31,32,36,37,41,43,44,48,49
 Other (more “objective”) measure of adherence 7 1.70 (1.22 to 2.37)23,3335,38,40,42
 First follow-up <60 days 8 1.49 (1.04 to 2.14)23,24,3337,42,43 6 1.18 (0.81 to 1.73)23,24,33,35,42,43
 First follow-up ≥60 days 6 1.60 (0.92 to 2.79)25,31,32,34,41,49 5 1.33 (0.96 to 1.85)25,31,32,34,41
 Retention rate <80% at immediate post or
  <70% at follow-up
11 1.60 (1.09 to 2.34)23,3133,3537,40,41,43,48 8 1.16 (0.84 to 1.61)23,3133,40,41,43,45
 Retention rate <80% immediately after
  intervention or <70% at follow-up
6 1.45 (0.95 to 2.20)24,25,34,42,44,49 6 1.46 (1.00 to 2.14)24,25,34,38,39,42
 Differential retention rate ≤5% 8 1.67 (1.07 to 2.58)31,32,35,37,40,42,44,49 5 1.23 (0.75 to 2.04)31,32,35,40,42
 Differential retention rate >5% 10 1.44 (1.05 to 1.97)2325,33,34,36,38,41,43,44 9 1.26 (0.94 to 1.67)2325,33,34,38,39,41,43
 Imputed missing data 6 1.55 (1.02 to 2.34)24,31,33,34,42,48 5 1.25 (0.91 to 1.72)24,31,33,34,42
 Did not impute missing data 12 1.48 (1.04 to 2.10)23,25,32,3538,40,41,43,44,49 9 1.26 (0.87 to 1.81)23,25,32,35,3841,43

According to the between-group heterogeneity statistic QB, for each comparison, there were no statistically significant (P < 0.05) differences between effect sizes. Effect sizes are not given for subgroups with only 1 study.

Numbers of studies fluctuate across stratification variables because some studies did not report information on the variable.

Intervention components were coded as present only if they were included as part of the intervention and not the control arm.