Table 3.
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.Hostile sexism | – | .58** | .01 | −.19† | .08 | −.08 | −.09 |
2.Benevolent sexism | .32** | – | .18† | .04 | .27** | .01 | −.19† |
3.Conservatism | .09 | .23† | – | .48** | .24* | .54*** | −.10 |
4.Self-transcendence | −.03 | .04 | .19 | – | .07 | .49*** | .01 |
5.Religiosity | .05 | .10 | .43*** | .05 | – | −.03 | −.24* |
6.Age | .05 | −.01 | .25* | .29* | .04 | – | .07 |
7.Education | −.26* | .00 | −.01 | −.10 | .03 | −.02 | – |
Note. Intercorrelations among men (n = 76) are presented below the diagonal, and intercorrelations among women (n = 104) are presented above the diagonal. Higher values on all measures indicate higher construct level. For correlations with benevolent sexism and hostile sexism, partial coefficients controlling for positive link between the two constructs are shown
† p < .10, * p < .05, ** p < .05