Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 18;2013:701693. doi: 10.1155/2013/701693

Table 2.

Results of the biomechanical analysis using the custom made biomechanical apparatus (Figures 3(a)3(c)).

Manufacturer Stem length (mm) Stem taper (deg) Polyethylene inlay (mm) Minimum distraction to dislocate (mm) AL at 25 mm of distraction (deg)/method 1 AL at 25 mm of distraction (deg)/method 2
Stryker—GMRS 47 0 10 38 3,2 (SD: 0,33) 3,3 (SD: 0,61)
DePuy—LPS/M.B.T. 46 0 27 11,2 (SD: 0,80) 11,3 (SD: 1,28)
DePuy—S-ROM Noiles 46 5 26 18,4 (SD: 1,73) 17,0 (SD: 1,13)
PLUS Orthopedics—RT-Plus 38 0 8 30 3,0 (SD: 0,90) 2,9 (SD: 0,90)
Zimmer—NexGen 46 0 12 36 2,1 (SD: 0,68) 2,3 (SD: 0,66)
Zimmer—NexGen 60 0 26 42 2,3 (SD: 0,32) 2,6 (SD: 0,44)

AL: angular laxity; SD: standard deviation.