Skip to main content
. 2014 May;91(100):79–91. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.023

Table A6.

Comparison of naïve and experienced individuals

Variable F df Coefficient±SE P
Condition 14.318 3 <0.001
Age 8.370 1 0.004
Condition*Age 2.706 3 0.044
Condition*Sex 1.492 4 0.202
Condition=Pull −2.568±0.932 0.006
Condition=Push 2.840±0.734 <0.001
Condition=Free Pull −1.268±0.975 0.193
Condition=Free Push 1.162
Age=Juvenile 0.531±1.147 0.643
Age=Adult 0
Condition=Pull*Age=Juvenile 2.839±1.359 0.037
Condition=Pull*Age=Adult 0
Condition=Push*Age=Juvenile −0.342±1.496 0.819
Condition=Push*Age=Adult 0
Condition=Free Pull*Age=Juvenile 1.304±1.507 0.387
Condition=Free Pull*Age=Adult 0
Condition=Free Push*Age=Juvenile 0
Condition=Free Push*Age=Adult 0

Best-fitting model assessed with a binomial generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a logit link function. Group and Individual identity were entered as random factors. Test-statistics (significant results in bold) and coefficients ± SE of significant results are also shown. Reference category: pull.

This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.