Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 4.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2013 Jan 20;144(0):43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.11.039

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Results (Odds Ratio) for Female and Male CHRs Who Converted to Axis I Psychotic Disorder Compared With Nonconverted CHRs

Female CHRs
95% CI for Exp(P)
Predictor β SE Wald p Exp(β) Lower Upper
Childhood Adjustment a
Social −.29 .23 1.54 .22 .75 .48 1.18
Academic .05 .24 .05 .82 1.06 .67 1.68
Baseline Global Functioning b
Social −.39 .24 2.69 .10 .68 .43 1.08
Role .16 .23 .48 .49 1.17 .75 1.82
Baseline Prodromal Symptomsc
Positive .50 .38 1.76 .19 1.66 .79 3.49
Negative .17 .36 .21 .65 1.18 .58 2.41
Disorganized .12 .32 .15 .70 1.13 .61 2.10
Male CHRs
95% CI for Exp(β)
Predictor β SE Wald p Exp(β) Lower Upper
Childhood Adjustment a
Social .17 .18 .88 .35 1.19 .83 1.69
Academic −.03 .22 .01 .91 .98 .64 1.50
Baseline Global Functioning b
Social −.50 .23 4.83 .03* .60 .39 .95
Role .18 .17 1.21 .27 1.20 .87 1.67
Baseline Prodromal Symptoms c
Positive .74 .32 5.31 .02* 2.10 1.12 3.94
Negative .07 .28 .06 .80 1.07 .62 1.85
Disorganized .33 .32 1.05 .31 1.39 .74 2.62

Note: CHR = Clinical high-risk; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.

***

p<.001,

**

p<.01,

*

p<.05.

a

Two subscales entered simultaneously.

b

Two subscales entered simultaneously.

c

Three subscales entered simultaneously.