Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 4;9(6):e98391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098391

Figure 11. Histogram and COV of regional MWF, histogram averaged over all regions.

Figure 11

(A) Histogram of regional MWF of each ROI averaged over 10 MS subjects. MWF in WM has a higher distribution than GM, and the two are statistically well separated, with p<0.001 from a student’s t-test between the WM and GM regions (B) Histogram from different subjects of MWF averaged over all regions. A t-test between the WM and GM groups yielded p<0.001. (C) COV of regional MWF for each subject, indicating low variability in regional variations in both WM and GM.