Skip to main content
. 2004 May;11(3):503–514. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.11.3.503-514.2004

TABLE 4.

Seroconversion detection

Method No. of seropositive animals detected by indicated method on indicated dpi/total no. of animalsa
Vaccinated animals
Animals inoculated with indicated PRRSV isolate
10
13
17
24
7 14 21 28 1-4-4 VR-2385 1-8-4 1-4-4 VR-2385 1-8-4 1-4-4 VR-2385 1-8-4 1-4-4 VR-2385 1-8-4
bELISA 0/30 29/30 29/30 30/30 0/10 0/9 0/11 0/10 0/9 0/11 10/10 8/9 10/11 9/10 9/9 11/11
IDEXX 0/30 29/30 28/30 29/30 0/10 0/9 0/11 0/10 1/9 0/11 9/10 3/9 7/11 10/10 9/9 11/11
IFA 0/30 30/30 30/30 30/30 0/10 0/9 0/11 0/10 0/9 0/11 10/10 3/9 9/11 10/10 9/9 11/11
a

Results of seroconversion detection by bELISA, IDEXX ELISA, and IFA were compared using samples from a vaccination-inoculation study. Overall, the methods agreed well. The kappa value for the comparison of bELISA to IDEXX was 0.94. The kappa value for the comparison of IDEXX to IFA was 0.95. The kappa value for the comparison of IFA to bELISA was 0.96. There were differences at certain dpi (depending on the virus isolate examined).