Skip to main content
. 2014 May 19;14:340. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-340

Table 4.

Treatment outcome by FCGR2A genotype, KRAS or BRAF mutational status, and therapy received

  FLOX
FLOX + cetuximab
 
H/H H/R R/R H/H H/R R/R Interaction P -value
KRAS wild-type (N = 273)
Number of patients
N = 16
N = 52
N = 20
N = 46
N = 98
N = 41
 
Response
63% (10/16)
42% (22/52)
45% (9/20)
46% (21/46)
51% (50/98)
56% (23/41)
0.27*
PFS
8.4
8.9
9.0
7.7
7.7
8.0
0.23
OS
31.6
23.6
19.0
21.4
20.7
18.9
0.23
KRAS mutated (N = 169)
Number of patients
N = 10
N = 25
N = 21
N = 28
N = 57
N = 28
 
Response
60% (6/10)
52% (13/25)
19% (4/21)
36% (10/28)
46% (26/57)
50% (14/28)
0.04*
PFS
8.1
8.3
7.1
7.7
8.1
6.7
0.90
OS
17.2
20.4
24.3
21.1
20.0
16.8
0.34
BRAF wild-type (N = 363)
Number of patients
N = 22
N = 62
N = 34
N = 58
N = 130
N = 57
 
Response
64% (14/22)
48% (30/62)
35% (12/34)
47% (27/58)
52% (68/130)
54% (31/57)
0.10*
PFS
9.3
8.9
7.7
8.5
8.1
8.0
0.47
OS
31.6
23.8
21.5
21.9
21.5
17.6
0.93
BRAF mutated (N = 47)
Number of patients
N =3
N = 10
N = 4
N = 8
N = 16
N = 6
 
Response
33% (1/3)
20% (2/10)
0% (0/4)
13% (1/8)
25% (4/16)
33% (2/6)
0.72*
PFS
4.3
5.1
3.8
3.8
4.6
5.8
0.36
OS 9.2 9.4 5.6 8.9 8.1 11.3 0.73

*Logistic regression, Cox proportional hazard model.